A few weeks ago, I discussed cohabitation and the problems associated with it.\u00a0 Is marriage necessarily better?\u00a0 What if the problems associated with marriages are as bad as, or worse than, the problems associated with cohabitation?\u00a0 Maybe cohabitation is the lesser of two evils.<\/p>\n
Is marriage just an archaic carryover from a time gone by, its tenants and vows outdated in our modern, enlightened, progressive world? \u00a0Cohabitating is no longer discussed in whispers, apparently no longer shameful.\u00a0 So why marry?\u00a0<\/p>\n
The risk of divorce is so high that some people hire an attorney before they marry, creating the future divorce settlement, just in case.\u00a0 I must admit, the logic of this prelude to marriage escapes me.\u00a0 I cannot imagine sitting down with my wife and saying, “Honey, you know there is a good chance we will divorce and I want to make sure if I get tired of you and leave, I will get what I know I deserve.”\u00a0 Does it make sense to start a marriage viewing your spouse as an adversary?\u00a0 I wonder what would happen if we worked as hard at maintaining the marriage as we do at planning the divorce.<\/p>\n
Author Gary Zukav claims, “The archetype of marriage was designed to assist physical survival…The archetype of marriage is no longer functional.”\u00a0 Is he right?\u00a0 Is that all marriage is?\u00a0 Others claim most of the marriages that do not end in divorce are “unfulfilled,” the spouses just going through the motions of marriage, something fundamentally wrong with marriage.\u00a0 Are there problems with marriage or are there problems with the people who are in the marriage?\u00a0 As I reviewed the reasons people divorce, I was impressed that nearly all revolved around one word – the word “I.”\u00a0 Interestingly, this was the same problem with cohabitation – it was all about “I.”\u00a0<\/p>\n
Over the last half century, we have systematically dismantled the sanctity of marriage.\u00a0 We have maligned it, discredited it, and trivialized it.\u00a0 Why is it still alive, although a bit crippled?\u00a0 Why do we keep trying something we are told is broken and unnecessary?\u00a0 Maybe the progressives and the enlightened have misled us.\u00a0<\/p>\n
The reports on the death of marriage are overrated.\u00a0 There are staggering benefits to marriage.\u00a0 Rather than a meaningless piece of paper offering no value to the relationship, marriage profoundly changes the couple’s goals, behaviors, and lives.\u00a0 And those changes are overwhelmingly positive.<\/p>\n
Succinctly, marriage leads to more happiness, better health, more wealth, and a superior sexual relationship.\u00a0 Although men will understand all these benefits of marriage, truthfully we will only remember that last one.\u00a0 Further, at the risk of starting a run on marriage licenses, I must point out studies also show that married men have sex with twice the frequency of single men.<\/p>\n
If marriage is nothing more than a piece of paper, cohabitating couples should fare as well as married couples in these various areas. \u00a0But, in every category measured by Linda J. Waite, professor of sociology at the University of Chicago, those in a marriage fared better than those cohabitating or single.\u00a0 Married men and women live longer. \u00a0Men and women in marriages are consistently happier with their lives than those cohabitating.\u00a0 Couples in marriages also view their relationship as more permanent, allowing them to work together financially, building wealth, and saving for the future.\u00a0 And what does marriage add to a couple’s sexual relationship not found in other relationships?\u00a0 It turns out to be simple and old fashioned, not at all enlightened and progressive.\u00a0 They have “traditional attitudes toward sexual morality.”<\/p>\n
Even so, does not the high divorce rate contradict this data?\u00a0 Again, according to Linda Waite, only 10 percent of couples who felt their marriage was horrible divorced.\u00a0 Of the remainder who stayed in their unhappy marriage, five years later 87 percent said their marriages “were either pretty good or very good.”\u00a0 Is the high divorce rate because “marriage” is a failure or is it because we again choose “I,” and divorce before expending the energy trying to work through the “bad patch?” \u00a0Surprising to me, Waite’s research shows that “dramatic turnarounds are commonplace,” the “typical” experience; not the aberrancy we might have expected.\u00a0 Certainly, there are marriages beyond repair, marriages that are physically dangerous and without hope, with divorce the only option and a necessity.\u00a0<\/p>\n
I had the misfortune of a failed marriage and now the good fortune of a wonderful marriage.\u00a0 I find none of this data surprising.\u00a0 Marriage offers a commitment not available in any other arrangement.\u00a0 It offers people a sense of well-being, a sense of meaning for their lives, contentment found in no other relationship.\u00a0 Marriage, far more than a piece of unnecessary paper, transforms the couple and is still the foundation of our society.<\/p>\n
![\"Reblog](\"http:\/\/img.zemanta.com\/reblog_e.png?x-id=4c0ec482-4ce8-433b-805d-8c88d82c48f6\")
<\/a>